subscribe to current local breaking news  the north shore sun
Search Current Week
Serving the North Shore of Eastern Brookhaven Town
For SUBSCRIBERS:
  Top Stories  
  Business
  Sports
  Police Reports
  Education
  Editorials
  Columns
  Letters
  Communities
  Calendar  
  RealEstate
  Health
  Archives
  Digital Edition

FREE CONTENT:
  Obituaries
  Slide Shows
  Classifieds
  Legal Notices  
  Public Meetings  
  Service Directory
  Community Links
  Local Businesses

FORUMS:
  Community Bulletin
   Board

  All Boards

  Send Letter to Editor
  Submit Obituary
  Email us
  Subscribe Now
  Site Help
  News Tips

times/review online

  Meet the Sun
  Contact the Sun
  Staff Roster
  Rates/Circulation


  The Suffolk Times
  The News-Review
  Shelter Island
  Reporter

  The Wine Press
Updated: 10/16/2009 - 4:05 AM



SWR health and safety vote set for Wednesday
Residents to decide fate of $3 million renovation proposal
  0 comments below

GRANT PARPAN PHOTO
District officials in Shoreham-Wading River say the State of New York could move to close Albert G. Prodell Middle School if several health and safety violations are not corrected. A vote to authorize $3 million to complete the projects is set for Wednesday.
Perhaps, it was the calm before the storm.

Only three residents at Tuesday's school board meeting spoke out on the Shoreham-Wading River health and safety proposition, but considering recent history, things will surely not be as smooth Wednesday when residents get to vote on the controversial $3 million proposal.

While more than 40 residents and employees of the district attended the meeting -- the final board get-together before the referendum -- only three residents spoke out on a proposal that calls for renovations to get Albert G. Prodell Middle School and the Briarcliff School in compliance with state building codes.

Despite relatively civil and sparsely attended open forums to discuss recent budgets and initiatives within the district, the board has had little success in getting voter approval in recent years.

The board discussed this fact Tuesday when it announced it would discontinue the practice of forming a budget advisory committee, hoping that would create more dialogue with residents about the budget at Board of Education meetings.

"[The budget advisory committee] meetings are public sessions, but nobody's going to them," said board trustee Leo Greeley. "I propose that we bring the budget preparation process back into the board setting so that hopefully more people are aware."

'More people are aware that this is not just cosmetic.' Scott Ericson, school board president
Board president Scott Ericson expressed concern over how the decision would be perceived in the community, where skepticism about the intentions of the board has run rampant in recent years. Such emotions have been fueled largely by front-page editorials in the weekly Community Journal newspaper, board members said.

While no member of the board referenced the newspaper by name during Tuesday's open session, several spoke out against an editorial in last week's Journal that they said featured several falsehoods about the upcoming vote.

Regardless of the cause, voter dissent has certainly been evident in recent elections.

The district's budget has been defeated the first time around each of the past two years -- and nine times in 22 years -- and the district is currently operating on a contingency budget for the second time in five school years.

The past three ballot initiatives proposed by the district have also been rejected on first attempt, although a technology upgrade plan passed the second time around.

And these votes have not failed due to voter disinterest. Taxpayers have turned out in droves to vote on recent budgets and ballot initiatives in Shoreham-Wading River. A $40 million bond proposal for repairs at Albert G. Prodell Middle School last October turned out 2,881 voters, nearly three times the number of residents who voted on a capital improvement bond proposal a year earlier in the neighboring Longwood School District -- a school system with nearly four times as many students as Shoreham-Wading River.

In telephone interviews last week, board members said that while they do think more voters are beginning to understand the need for repairs at the two schools, they're cautiously optimistic about Wednesday's vote.

"So far we've just been unsuccessful in convincing people about the need for these repairs," Mr. Ericson said. "I do believe, however, that more people are aware that this is not just cosmetic. More people realize this is for health and safety."

Should the health and safety proposition be rejected next week, board members said one option to get the work done might be to include it in a future budget, which could impact taxes. However, board trustee Bill McGrath cautioned that such a project could only be completed if the district were not operating on a contingency budget.

gparpan@northshoresun.com

Quick facts

Total cost: $3 million

Future cost to taxpayers: $0

How will it be paid? District reserves, state aid

Can that money be used to stabilize tax hike? No

Will the work bring buildings into code? Yes

What needs does the proposition fulfill?

* Ventilation improvements at Briarcliff and the middle school

* Fire safety improvements at Briarcliff and the middle school

* Emergency exiting improvements at the middle school

* Accessibility requirements and code requirements at Briarcliff and the middle school

How do I vote?

District residents can vote on the $3 million health and safety proposition between 7 a.m. and 9 p.m. Wednesday, Oct. 14, at Shoreham-Wading River High School.

Notice about comments:
The North Shore Sun is pleased to offer readers the ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. The North Shore Sun does not edit user submitted statements and we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not The North Shore Sun. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Service and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website.




Add your comments below:










captcha 26a6c2d8578844ad895e22bfccecf83c





0 comments found
StumbleUpon.com
Cutest Pets
Most Popular


Voice your opinion

Start a discussion, join a discussion or make a comment.

Click "Community Bulletin Board" link on the left or "Discuss this story" link at the top of every story to get started.



FREE Sun podcasts
Sun Parks Guide

summer wine press 2007

© Times-Review Newspapers
Terms of Service - Privacy Policy