subscribe to current local breaking news  the north shore sun
Search Current Week
Serving the North Shore of Eastern Brookhaven Town
For SUBSCRIBERS:
  Top Stories  
  Business
  Sports
  Police Reports
  Education
  Editorials
  Columns
  Letters
  Communities
  Calendar  
  RealEstate
  Health
  Archives
  Digital Edition

FREE CONTENT:
  Obituaries
  Slide Shows
  Classifieds
  Legal Notices  
  Public Meetings  
  Service Directory
  Community Links
  Local Businesses

FORUMS:
  Community Bulletin
   Board

  All Boards

  Send Letter to Editor
  Submit Obituary
  Email us
  Subscribe Now
  Site Help
  News Tips

times/review online

  Meet the Sun
  Contact the Sun
  Staff Roster
  Rates/Circulation


  The Suffolk Times
  The News-Review
  Shelter Island
  Reporter

  The Wine Press
Updated: 1/8/2010 - 4:10 AM



Bonner wants to rescind MTA vote
Comptroller already paid tax, but councilwoman wants do-over
  1 comments below

SUN FILE PHOTO
Brookhaven Republicans say Supervisor Mark Lesko, a Democrat, authorized finance commissioner Charlene Kagel (pictured) to pay off the state's MTA tax without approval from the Town board.
Brookhaven Town Finance Commissioner Charlene Kagel has paid the Metropolitan Transit Authority tax to the state, but there's still one problem.

Councilwoman Jane Bonner (C-Rocky Point) wants to rescind her vote on the resolution designating funds to the budget line that's allocated to the MTA payroll tax.

The tax, which is part of a $2.26 billion MTA bailout plan passed by the state Legislature in May, mandates that businesses, governments and schools pay 34 cents for every $100 of paid wages. The measure has drawn widespread criticism from lawmakers who feel it unjustly taxes Long Island residents who do not benefit from the authority's transportation services. After some squabbling over whether or not to pay the tax, and the tabling of at least one resolution, board members finally approved a resolution on Dec. 8 designating the funds needed to pay the tax, so that the budget line would not be overdrawn.

Ms. Bonner was expected to call Tuesday for the reintroduction of the resolution because she felt duped by the wording. The resolution did not explicitly outline that its purpose was to designate money to the budget line for the "MTA payroll tax," only "payroll," she said.

"It's sleight of hand," said Ms. Bonner, who has strongly opposed the tax since its introduction early this year. Ms. Bonner said she did not believe she would get support from enough of her fellow town board members to pass the measure. This week's Town Board meeting was held after a special holiday deadline for this week's North Shore Sun.

Ms. Kagel believed she had developed a consensus from the board that the tax would be paid by the deadline of Nov. 6 to avoid spending more money on penalties, and she made the payment -- an action requiring the Town Board to designate funding to the specific budget line for the MTA tax. Both Ms. Bonner and Councilman Steve Fiore-Rosenfeld (D-Setauket) abstained from voting on a previous bill to transfer the funds. Their former colleague, deceased Councilman Keith Romaine (R-Moriches), voted against the measure. Although the resolution has been tabled since then, it has also been rendered moot by the "housekeeping" resolution that passed two weeks ago.

'This is grandstanding in its worst form.' Town Supervisor Mark Lesko
Supervisor Mark Lesko denied Ms. Bonner's allegation that the resolution was slipped in under the cloak of secrecy, pointing out that the resolution was worked on by Ms. Kagel and Brookhaven Town attorney Karen Wilutis, who were both appointed by Ms. Bonner and the Republican/Conservative majority.

"This is grandstanding in its worst form," Mr. Lesko said. "Clearly Jane Bonner thinks that she is above the law."

Discussion of the "housekeeping" resolution turned heated this past Thursday when board members hashed out the ramifications for Ms. Kagel, who officials said could be subject to a misdemeanor charge for paying the tax without a corresponding budget line. Former Southampton Town attorney Garrett Swenson of Coram confirmed this week that he is representing Ms. Kagel; however, he declined to comment further.

Concerned, Mr. Lesko requested that Ms. Kagel have Mr. Swenson at the Town Board meeting Tuesday and directed her to supply the town with a bill for his legal services.

"It used to be in Brookhaven that crimes were committed in secret," Mr. Lesko said during a telephone interview Tuesday. "Now you have the absurd reality that an elected official is directing the town finance commissioner to commit a crime in the open."

Fourth District Councilwoman Connie Kepert (D-Middle Island) took fault with Ms. Bonner's suggestion. Ms. Kepert questioned the message it would send to taxpayers if the town board voted to rescind the funds and cost them more money in penalties.

"It doesn't make a lot of sense to me," she said.

But not everyone agreed with his assessment that Ms. Kagel could be compromised should Ms. Bonner garner enough support to reintroduce the resolution and it is subsequently defeated.

Councilman Timothy Mazzei (R-Blue Point) cited his 30 years of experience as an attorney in the criminal law field and offered his services should Ms. Kagel need them.

"And, quite frankly, I'll represent you for free," Mr. Mazzei added.

Ms. Bonner disagreed with the possibility that Ms. Kagel could be arrested for the Town Board's actions.

"I don't believe that the 'MTA payroll police' are planning to show up at [Charlene Kagel's] doorstep," Ms. Bonner said.

peggy@northshoresun.com

Notice about comments:
The North Shore Sun is pleased to offer readers the ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. The North Shore Sun does not edit user submitted statements and we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not The North Shore Sun. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Service and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website.




Add your comments below:










captcha 64cfed1f92454c76bd19e5e76505f626





1 comments found

NON-PARTISAN SUPERVISOR? : 12/31/2009
Mr. Lesko:
You said you are non-partisan and that Republican Kathy Walsh becoming your Deputy Supervisor is proof of your determination to run a non-partisan town. Why then do you proceed to say nasty things about Jane Bonner after engineering a negative smear campaign against her re-election that blew up in your face? You used poor John Leonard as your messenger boy, and embarrassed both him and the Democratic Party. Leave Jane alone. You prove everyday how much you fear strong and successful women. You should join Marsha Laufer and move to Florida. We love Jane!. You can disagree with her views without being such a misogynsist!




StumbleUpon.com
Cutest Pets
Most Popular


Voice your opinion

Start a discussion, join a discussion or make a comment.

Click "Community Bulletin Board" link on the left or "Discuss this story" link at the top of every story to get started.



FREE Sun podcasts
Sun Parks Guide

summer wine press 2007

© Times-Review Newspapers
Terms of Service - Privacy Policy