subscribe to current local breaking news  the north shore sun
Search Current Week
Serving the North Shore of Eastern Brookhaven Town
For SUBSCRIBERS:
  Top Stories  
  Business
  Sports
  Police Reports
  Education
  Editorials
  Columns
  Letters
  Communities
  Calendar  
  RealEstate
  Health
  Archives
  Digital Edition

FREE CONTENT:
  Obituaries
  Slide Shows
  Classifieds
  Legal Notices  
  Public Meetings  
  Service Directory
  Community Links
  Local Businesses

FORUMS:
  Community Bulletin
   Board

  All Boards

  Send Letter to Editor
  Submit Obituary
  Email us
  Subscribe Now
  Site Help
  News Tips

times/review online

  Meet the Sun
  Contact the Sun
  Staff Roster
  Rates/Circulation


  The Suffolk Times
  The News-Review
  Shelter Island
  Reporter

  The Wine Press
Updated: 6/12/2009 - 4:04 AM



SWR goes to contingency
More than 200 residents attend BOE meeting to voice opinions
  0 comments below

Wading River resident John Hopkins, a member of Shoreham-Wading River's financial review committee, at Tuesday night's board meeting, with a petition he's circulating regarding district finances.
PETER BLASL PHOTO
Shoreham-Wading River schools will be operating on a contingency budget next year, following the Board of Education's unanimous vote Tuesday night to adopt the contingency plan rather than put its own budget up for a revote.

More than 200 people showed up at the meeting to voice their opinions on the failed budget and the district's financial situation and to criticize or support the board's decisions.

The $55.9 million contingency budget is just $230,000 less than the failed budget, cutting funds from transportation, equipment, maintenance expenses and student supplies.

Board member Leo Greeley said the original budget the board presented to the community was frugal -- one the board felt was already at contingency level.

In past meetings, he said the board had stated it would likely go to contingency if the budget failed by a large majority.

"This shouldn't be a surprise. We publicly announced this was more than likely what we would do given the results of the budget [vote]," Mr. Greely said, adding that the board realized the likelihood of the budget's going down was high.

'To those attacking the Board of Education, I remind you that these are your neighbors serving voluntarily.'
The district's proposed $56.1 million budget was defeated by a margin of more than 750 votes on May 19, when voters also voted down the district's health and safety proposition to fix code violations at the middle school by a slim 34-vote margin.

But residents are still headed toward a 25.6 percent tax levy increase coming after a two-year tax freeze, a situation many taxpayers are unhappy about.

In April, the board voted 6-1 to take the increase all at once instead of borrowing more money to mitigate the increase and take it in increments over a few years' time. Board members cited an uncertain economic future and its potential impact on the state budget process as the reason for their decision.

"The tax spike can't be avoided," said board member Jack Costas. "It can be delayed, it can be split, it can be subsidized, but it can't be avoided."

As it stands, the board will be renewing $3.8 million in debt this year it had originally expected to pay off. The board borrowed $11.4 million against $35.8 million it is owed in prior years' state aid, but only received $7.5 million of the $11.5 million prior years' state aid payment it had expected.

Superintendent Harriet Copel briefly spoke at the meeting about the possibility of borrowing against the remainder of the prior years' state aid money via the state-owned Municipal Bond Bank Agency, an idea championed by State Sen. Ken LaValle (R-Port Jefferson). The idea, first brought forward during the 2006-07 school year, was abandoned in 2008 because the board felt the terms of borrowing were too risky. Instead, they chose to borrow against anticipated payments via short-term revenue anticipation notes.

Dr. Copel said the district is in talks to see if the terms of the Municipal Bond Banking Agency borrowing could be modified, but they remain as they were when the district originally chose not to accept them. The district has until July 1 to decide whether to move forward with Municipal Bond Banking Agency borrowing this year.

At the meeting, the residents' comment period lasted for more than an hour as some residents gave board members quite a lashing, while others stood to defend the board.

"You're in the position where you are now because you lacked the fiscal discipline and courage to spend inside your income," said Ridge resident John Grady. "You do not represent the people."

Wading River resident and budget advisory committee member Ed Safford said the board should continue its discussions about the MBBA borrowing with Mr. LaValle and that the board needs to confront the rate of escalating costs in the district. Teachers and other employees should give concessions, he said, bringing applause from some of the meeting attendees. The repairs having to do with the health and safety proposal need to be expedited, he said, and it will be irresponsible to delay them. The best way for people dissatisfied with board members' decisions, he added, is to run candidates against them. Both board president Michael Fucito and Mr. Greeley were re-elected in May after they ran unopposed.

Finally, he defended the board.

"To those attacking the Board of Education, I remind you that these are your neighbors serving voluntarily," he said, to more applause.

Shoreham resident Chris Zukowski said the community's frustrations should not be directed at the board, but at the district's lack of state aid, which is a continuing problem. Other districts with similar income levels and enrollments receive a much higher amount of annual aid, she noted.

"You can't project your anger on a group that didn't make the rules," she said. "You should be mad as you are mad, but you should be focusing your [anger] in the right direction."

Shoreham resident Anthony De Louise said he wasn't sure the board had taken out a calculator and figured out what a family has to do to net out an additional $200 a month to pay taxes, especially if they live on a fixed income or have had their pay reduced.

"The years are going to fall off the calendar," he said. "And soon those people's names on the PTA and PTO are going to be a distant memory, and they're going to be sitting on the other side of this auditorium in a spot that a lot of people, especially seniors, are in right now."

When people began to clap, he stopped them.

"This is not them against us," Mr. De Louise said. "I was really kind of upset to see that every single time someone said something, one faction or another clapped. That's the board's fault for allowing that kind of schism to develop in the community."

asnyder@northshoresun.com

Notice about comments:
The North Shore Sun is pleased to offer readers the ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. The North Shore Sun does not edit user submitted statements and we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not The North Shore Sun. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Service and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website.




Add your comments below:










captcha a9b5d40f74254a5b82f89cef0ef203b9





0 comments found
StumbleUpon.com
Cutest Pets
Most Popular


Voice your opinion

Start a discussion, join a discussion or make a comment.

Click "Community Bulletin Board" link on the left or "Discuss this story" link at the top of every story to get started.



FREE Sun podcasts
Sun Parks Guide

summer wine press 2007

© Times-Review Newspapers
Terms of Service - Privacy Policy