subscribe to current local breaking news   The Suffolk Times
Search Current Week
Serving Long Island's North Fork since 1857
For SUBSCRIBERS:
  Top Stories  
  Business
  Police Reports
  Sports
  Education
  Editorials
  Columns
  Letters to the Editor
  Community News
  Calendar  
  Real Estate
  Health
  Food & Wine
  Back Issues
  Digital Edition

FREE CONTENT:
  Obituaries
  Slide Shows
  Movie Listings
  Community Links
  Classifieds
  Legal Notices  
  Public Meetings  
  Service Directory
  Antiques & Such
  Local Businesses

FORUMS:
  Community
   Bulletin Board

  All Boards

  Send Letter to Editor
  Submit Obituary
  Email us
  Subscribe Now
  News Tips
  Site Help

times/review online

  Contact/About

  Staff Roster

  Rates/Circulation


  The News-Review

  Shelter Island
  Reporter

  The North Shore Sun

  The Wine Press

Updated: 12/17/2009 - 4:05 AM



Can Orient's groundwater be saved?
Orient, East Marion residents ask town to establish a new groundwater protection district
  0 comments below

Spurred by concern about the impact of new residential construction that could follow the expansion of public water service, some Orient and East Marion residents are pushing the town for another level of groundwater protection.

The special groundwater protection district option now under town review would have no impact on the Suffolk County Water Authority's much-contested $3.8 million proposal to run over three miles of new transmission lines from East Marion into Orient. But it would ban the use of pesticides on local yards and prohibit some business uses, such as dry cleaners.

Agricultural operations would be exempt.

Area residents supporting a new overlay district, which would work in concert with rather than replace local zoning, packed recent Town Board code committee meetings. The town assigned Mark Terry, its principal planner, to investigate.

"The devil is always in the details," said Supervisor Scott Russell.

A water protection district could address a broad range of goals, such as preventing stormwater runoff, the supervisor added.

'We need to improve our understanding of water pollution.' Orient resident Keri Christ
"But it would not offer any magic solutions to stop the public water supply from being installed," he said.

Even so, a new groundwater protection strategy developed for Orient or East Marion could be applicable in other parts of the town, with or without public water service, said the supervisor.

The Group for the East End is developing its own watershed protection plan for the North Fork.

Only a thin strip of land between Orient Harbor and the Sound connects Orient to East Marion and that leaves Orient with its own separate groundwater supply. The residue of agricultural chemicals and saltwater intrusion plague a number of private wells in the area. The water authority has said the new mains may be the only way to bring clean water to those with tainted wells.

The town has taken the position that the authority cannot move on installing the new mains until it first submits a formal request to amend Southold's water service map and completes a full environmental review. A group of Orient residents recently filed a state Supreme Court action seeking to block the project until such a review is undertaken. The authority has said Orient is already within its approved service area.

"We need to improve our understanding of water pollution and hydrogeological connections," said Orient resident Keri Christ. "Land use planning has to take all of this information, including our aquifer, into consideration. Without proper planning and management, Orient and its enormous environmental values will slowly disappear."

tkelly@timesreview.com

Notice about comments:
The Suffolk Times is pleased to offer readers the ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. The Suffolk Times does not edit user submitted statements and we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not The Suffolk Times. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Service and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website.




Add your comments below:










captcha b69d8ebd7b1d4908898dbd0073dcf8dc





0 comments found

Most Popular


Voice your opinion

Start a discussion, join a discussion or make a comment.

Click "Community Bulletin Board" link on the left or "Discuss this story" link at the top of every story to get started.






summer wine press 2007

© Times-Review Newspapers
Terms of Service - Privacy Policy