subscribe to current local breaking news   The Suffolk Times
Search Current Week
Serving Long Island's North Fork since 1857
For SUBSCRIBERS:
  Top Stories  
  Business
  Police Reports
  Sports
  Education
  Editorials
  Columns
  Letters to the Editor
  Community News
  Calendar  
  Real Estate
  Health
  Food & Wine
  Back Issues
  Digital Edition

FREE CONTENT:
  Obituaries
  Slide Shows
  Movie Listings
  Community Links
  Classifieds
  Legal Notices  
  Public Meetings  
  Service Directory
  Antiques & Such
  Local Businesses

FORUMS:
  Community
   Bulletin Board

  All Boards

  Send Letter to Editor
  Submit Obituary
  Email us
  Subscribe Now
  News Tips
  Site Help

times/review online

  Contact/About

  Staff Roster

  Rates/Circulation


  The News-Review

  Shelter Island
  Reporter

  The North Shore Sun

  The Wine Press

Updated: 12/17/2009 - 4:05 AM



Albany fiddles as rights burn
Editorial   0 comments below

It is all but impossible to separate politics from policy in Albany and partisan gamesmanship is both art and science within the state Legislature, the Senate especially. That's not to say town and county governments always put the public's interest first, but the worst of what goes on in Town Hall can't come close to matching the callous and calculated conduct so routine in the capital. This year's Senate leadership deadlock is an extreme example, but it's not the only stain on the tablecloth.

State lawmakers can't seem to summon the insight or political will to close an abysmal budget gap, but they found the time and the energy to take on, and make a mockery of, the somehow still-controversial idea that gay and lesbian couples deserve the same legal rights and protections that married people take for granted.

The Assembly previously approved a gay marriage bill with ease. All that stood before the passage of a law truly deserving of the term "historic" was action within the Senate. For many years, the Senate was as rock-solid Republican as the Assembly is Democratic, but that stability crumbled last year when the Democrats gained the majority. Under the new order in Albany, legalizing gay marriage might have seemed a slam-dunk, but it wasn't. The bill failed, by a surprisingly wide margin, and now New York can be mentioned in the same breath as Maine and other areas where gay marriage failed. (See reporter Julie Lane's column, page 9.)

It didn't have to be that way.

A pre-vote headcount failed to find a willing majority and yet the measure still made it to the floor. Not surprisingly, Republicans long opposed to gay marriage, including the 1st District's Kenneth LaValle, voted accordingly. The shocking turnabout is the measure failed in a Democratically controlled chamber for lack of Democratic votes.

Were the bill's supporters, including the governor, willing to throw the dice on the rights of so very many people to make a statement and make opponents stand up and be counted? If so, that strategy backfired in a big way. A bill that fails so spectacularly is unlikely to arise, phoenix-like, anytime soon. And so gays and lesbians will continue to carry second-class status.

It's difficult to imagine a noble intent standing behind political skulduggery, especially in Albany. We can only hope that with the defeat of the gay marriage bill, alternative legislation designed to provide full rights and legal protection, absent any reference to the dreaded "M" word, at least for now, will seem acceptable by comparison and finally become law. That won't be the end of it by any means, but what a day that will be.

Notice about comments:
The Suffolk Times is pleased to offer readers the ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. The Suffolk Times does not edit user submitted statements and we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not The Suffolk Times. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Service and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website.




Add your comments below:










captcha e3ebc35e8fbf4401ad20fc3497ec3170





0 comments found

Most Popular


Voice your opinion

Start a discussion, join a discussion or make a comment.

Click "Community Bulletin Board" link on the left or "Discuss this story" link at the top of every story to get started.






summer wine press 2007

© Times-Review Newspapers
Terms of Service - Privacy Policy