subscribe to current local breaking news   The Suffolk Times
Search Current Week
Serving Long Island's North Fork since 1857
For SUBSCRIBERS:
  Top Stories  
  Business
  Police Reports
  Sports
  Education
  Editorials
  Columns
  Letters to the Editor
  Community News
  Calendar  
  Real Estate
  Health
  Food & Wine
  Back Issues
  Digital Edition

FREE CONTENT:
  Obituaries
  Slide Shows
  Movie Listings
  Community Links
  Classifieds
  Legal Notices  
  Public Meetings  
  Service Directory
  Antiques & Such
  Local Businesses

FORUMS:
  Community
   Bulletin Board

  All Boards

  Send Letter to Editor
  Submit Obituary
  Email us
  Subscribe Now
  News Tips
  Site Help

times/review online

  Contact/About

  Staff Roster

  Rates/Circulation


  The News-Review

  Shelter Island
  Reporter

  The North Shore Sun

  The Wine Press

Updated: 12/3/2009 - 4:05 AM



Mattituck under a microscope
How to stop Route 25 sprawl
  0 comments below

As the town wrestles with the multi-year rewrite of its comprehensive plan -- a guide to future development -- one question has been singled out for special consideration.

What can be done to keep Main Road in Mattituck from becoming Route 58 east?

Southold's planning staff has been charged with taking a critical look at current and future business growth along the Main Road commercial corridor stretching east from the train trestle in Laurel to Wickham Avenue, just beyond Love Lane. They'll focus on zoning, land use patterns, traffic and commercial design standards.

"There is a real concern that the development taking place is ad hoc and not supported by the infrastructure," said Supervisor Scott Russell. "We plan on reaching out to Mattituck business representatives to discuss this study with an understanding that our goal is to promote local business and that future land use should be complementing our existing businesses."

The supervisor said the reason for the study, which will take about two months to complete, is not to restrict business growth. While it may conclude that some commercial uses should be excluded, it may also suggest permitting others not currently allowed.

In essence, the study seeks to identify the steps needed to realize the Mattituck stakeholders committee's vision for the community's future.

'It is becoming difficult to tell where Route 58 stops and our Route 25 starts.' Supervisor Scott Russell
The stakeholders concluded that, with a few exceptions, the Main Road corridor "possesses many of the bad features of western Long Island sprawl. Many 'Tuckers' are sensitive to the appearance of this district, as it forms the first (and misleading) impression of the hamlet."

The group described the local architecture as largely "a modern hodge-podge."

A review of commercial design standards is one of the tasks on the planning staff's to-do list.

"Frankly, I am relieved that we can focus some attention on that hamlet," Mr. Russell said. "It is becoming difficult to tell where Route 58 stops and our Route 25 starts. We need to be attentive to that hamlet for the character of that community and for the long-term stability of our established businesses there."

The stakeholders also raised the issue of turning Love Lane into a pedestrian-only mall, but noted that there is no consensus on that change. The street is closed a few times each year for special events, such as the Mattituck Street Fair in July.

Mattituck Chamber of Commerce president Terry McShane agrees with the supervisor about turning a "desperately needed" planning focus on the hamlet.

"It will give us a handle on what businesses help and what businesses hurt," he said. "I'm concerned about Mattituck's future and the future of all small businesses."

tkelly@timesreview.com

Notice about comments:
The Suffolk Times is pleased to offer readers the ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. The Suffolk Times does not edit user submitted statements and we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not The Suffolk Times. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Service and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website.




Add your comments below:










captcha 0585cc950d164d3dbb622bccf8b83c2e





0 comments found

Most Popular


Voice your opinion

Start a discussion, join a discussion or make a comment.

Click "Community Bulletin Board" link on the left or "Discuss this story" link at the top of every story to get started.






summer wine press 2007

© Times-Review Newspapers
Terms of Service - Privacy Policy