subscribe to current local breaking news   The Suffolk Times
Search Current Week
Serving Long Island's North Fork since 1857
For SUBSCRIBERS:
  Top Stories  
  Business
  Police Reports
  Sports
  Education
  Editorials
  Columns
  Letters to the Editor
  Community News
  Calendar  
  Real Estate
  Health
  Food & Wine
  Back Issues
  Digital Edition

FREE CONTENT:
  Obituaries
  Slide Shows
  Movie Listings
  Community Links
  Classifieds
  Legal Notices  
  Public Meetings  
  Service Directory
  Antiques & Such
  Local Businesses

FORUMS:
  Community
   Bulletin Board

  All Boards

  Send Letter to Editor
  Submit Obituary
  Email us
  Subscribe Now
  News Tips
  Site Help

times/review online

  Contact/About

  Staff Roster

  Rates/Circulation


  The News-Review

  Shelter Island
  Reporter

  The North Shore Sun

  The Wine Press

Updated: 6/25/2009 - 4:04 AM



The wives can finally vote in Park District
Commissioners do away with behind-the-times election law
  0 comments below

Mattituck Park District commissioners last week gave up their antiquated interpretation of a 1941 voting law, passing a resolution that will let renters, spouses and children of voting age whose names do not appear on property deeds to cast ballots.

The commissioners decided to act last Thursday before the state attorney general or legislature weighed in on the issue.

The previous board of commissioners had interpreted the law to mean that voting on budgets must be limited to property owners. In addition, children of voting age living with their parents could not vote under the old interpretation.

Peter Young, who lives with his elderly mother at 2700 Bay Ave., sued the district last year after being denied the right to vote in August. A state Supreme Court judge tossed the case out because of defective service of court papers but left the door open to a renewed suit. Instead, Mr. Young asked the commissioners to act to avoid further litigation.

"I'm elated at their decision," Mr. Young said. "I hope that it allows for more citizen participation in the district."

The once contentious issue was dispatched quickly, but practically everything else on the agenda was cause for an argument, particularly between commissioners Doris McGreevy and Tom McCaffery.

'Whatever I suggest or recommend is just cast aside.' Mattituck Park District commissioner Tom McCaffery
APPOINTMENT DRAWS IRE

The hiring of Lydia Tortora as part-time senior clerk typist drew criticism from Mr. McCaffery, who argued that the job should have been put out to bid. Ms. McGreevy defended the appointment, saying the park's longtime clerk was ill and, in any case, didn't have the typing skills that the district now needs. Ms. Tortora had stepped into the void and was doing an excellent job, she said.

Taking a shot at last month's decision not to rehire longtime district employee Denise Goehringer as a summer park worker but to hire Ms. Tortora, Mr. McCaffery complained, "Whatever I suggest or recommend is just cast aside."

Because the job is part time, it doesn't need to be put out to bid, commission chairman Nicholas Deegan said. He and Ms. McGreevy voted in favor of the appointment and Ms. Tortora has the $18 an hour job for 17.5 hours per week.

Both Mr. Deegan and Ms. McGreevy accused Mr. McCaffery of skipping work sessions, saying he would have had ample time to weigh in with his opinions had he attended. But he said he saw no use in attending when they ignore him.

he should be thanking us

The next argument between the two commissioners was about sending a thank-you letter to Walter Gatz of Gatz Landscaping for donating labor to blend the soil conditioner Turface Pro League Red into the soil in the infield at the Bay Avenue ball fields.

Ms. McGreevy maintained Mr. Gatz had overcharged for the materials and should be thanking the board. This time, Mr. Deegan voted with Mr. McCaffery to send the thank-you letter.

jlane@timesreview.com

Notice about comments:
The Suffolk Times is pleased to offer readers the ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. The Suffolk Times does not edit user submitted statements and we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not The Suffolk Times. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Service and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website.




Add your comments below:










captcha 7e9c6a4da4f64d378a47ee1a9e3336f5





0 comments found
Cutchogue St. Patrick's Day parade rescheduled
Times/Review Pet Slide Show
Send us your photos



Most Popular


Voice your opinion

Start a discussion, join a discussion or make a comment.

Click "Community Bulletin Board" link on the left or "Discuss this story" link at the top of every story to get started.






summer wine press 2007

© Times-Review Newspapers
Terms of Service - Privacy Policy