Wireless way to heaven?
Public sings mostly praises for church steeple cell tower
3 comments below
Space inside the majestic steeple of Cutchogue Presbyterian Church might help improve local wireless communications as T-Mobile has designs on installing eight cell antennas there.
Church officials signed a contract with T-Mobile -- which will pay $2,000 per month to rent the steeple -- more than two years ago, but the town had a moratorium on all new cell towers that only recently ended.
Appearing before the Southold Town Planning Board for a public hearing, T-Mobile attorney Greg Alvarez said a section of the 65-foot steeple will be removed in order to install eight cell antennas inside the highest point in the hamlet.
The exterior replacement materials used in the work "will match the existing steeple in color and texture," he said.
Outside equipment, he said, will be located east of the back parking lot on a concrete pad, surrounded by a vinyl fence and landscaping to "soften the appearance of the fence," said Paul Gardlman, an architect for the project. Cables will be run underground from the outdoor equipment area, into the church building and up to the steeple.
Other experts in town planning, electrical engineering and real estate asserted that the cell installation would have very little impact on the neighborhood -- other than providing significantly better cell reception.
The only point of contention had to do with how cell transmissions might affect the health of children attending Our Lady of Mercy elementary school, two doors down from the church.
Mark Kujawski, an attorney representing the school, asked microwave emissions expert Lou Cornacchia if he had analyzed how the emissions would affect schoolchildren in the neighboring playground.
Mr. Cornacchia said that his study found the "worst case emissions" area would be limited to the top of the school's roof, where the strength of the microwave beam would be .5 percent of the maximum level allowed by the Federal Communications Commission.
"Our analysis uses criteria that is theoretical, but in reality, emissions are always 10 to 100 times less" than the federal criteria, he said.
After the presentation, Cutchogue resident Benja Schwartz was not convinced there would be no health risks from the proposed cell installation.
"Not everybody agrees with federal standards," he said. The technology "has not been sufficiently studied. The burden should be to prove that it's safe, not to prove that it's not dangerous. The current cell-transmitting devices are likely to be obsolete in a few years. Meanwhile, what if even one child gets cancer? Is it worth it? Not to me if it were my kid."
Barbara McAdam, a church elder at Cutchogue Presbyterian who also lives near the church, saw things differently. "I've spoken out many times at meetings like these to protect my church and protect my neighbor, but I see no problem with installing a couple of antennas," she said. "I've done a lot of research on this as well, and I feel that any exposure would be far below FCC standards."
eschultz@timesreview.com
The Suffolk Times is pleased to offer readers the ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. The Suffolk Times does not edit user submitted statements and we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not The Suffolk Times. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Service and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website.
3 comments found
Thanks : 1/17/2010
The choice for this antenna should be made by the people that live in the surrounding neighborhood or who have children attending that great school. The health and well being of them must come first!! If they vote that they are in favor of letting toxic emissions park in their backyard, and hang out at every BBQ or linger around their kids playground, then what can you do? I think the people of Cutchogue are a little smarter then that though. I have t-mobile, don't think you have to do it for me. I am thinking about switching now. Good Luck
FCC : 1/14/2010
The FCC is the fox watching the chicken coop. Except that the FCC fox doesn't eat chicken. The FCC foxhole is full of broadcasters. We, the public are the chicken being fried by the radiofrequency radiation!
Cost Benefit Analysis : 1/14/2010
The real costs of the proposed radio frequency emissions are not known.
The federal regulations are based on research which is over 25 years old. They only consider thermal impacts. Electromagnetic radio frequency radiation also produces non-thermal impacts from long term exposure to even low levels.
Federal standards don't mean we are safe. The standards set an "acceptable" level of risk. But, the standards fail to consider current scientific knowledge.
As for benefits, Other experts asserted that the cell installation would provide significantly better cell reception for T-Mobile customers only! Verizon, AT&T, and other cell phone companies have their own anntenas and will not benefit from those proposed to be installed on top of the church in Cutchogue.
